With the recent success of the BNP in EU elections and after reading some of the comments on this YouTube video. I was left with the question, who qualifies as British in the eyes of the BNP? Seeking an answer, I visited the primary source of information about the BNP and it’s policies, their official website. There, in the most current version of the BNP Constitution (9th Edition, September 2005), I found this paragraph (Section 1, 2b):

“The British National Party stands for the preservation of the national and ethnic
character of the British people and is wholly opposed to any form of racial
integration between British and non-European peoples. It is therefore committed
to stemming and reversing the tide of non-white immigration and to restoring, by
legal changes, negotiation and consent, the overwhelmingly white makeup of the
British population that existed in Britain prior to 1948.”

Based purely on this text, which is quoted verbatim, the following statements are true:

1. The national and ethnic character of British people must be preserved.
2. Racial integration between British and non-European people is prohibited.
3. Non-white people who have only lived in Britain since 1948 do not belong in Britain because of their impact on 1.

Using those statements we can deduce that the following people are not welcome to migrate to Britain:

• Non-Europeans
• Non-white Europeans

Examples:

• George Lucas
• Theirry Henry

We can also deduce that the following people are not welcome to stay in Britain if they currently reside here:

• Non-white people who were not living in Britain before 1948

Examples:

• Theo Walcott
• Lewis Hamilton

An example of how this system might be called into dispute:

• Greg Rusedski can stay in Britain, but Frank Bruno can’t.
• Adolf Hitler could have migrated to Britain, but Barack Obama wouldn’t be permitted.